Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's global score of 80.3. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel XL is noticeably older than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, it's body is a little thinner and way lighter. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher display density. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture and a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features improved battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs more than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Nokia 8 V 5G UW. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.