Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's score of 80.3. Motorola Edge 50 is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also much lighter and thinner than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has the newer 14 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10 version, giving you a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has a better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1220 x 2712px resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit superior battery life than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.