Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Mystic indigo |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, having a score of 80.3 against 79.7. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW construction is heavier but just a little bit thinner than Moto G Stylus, and they were released with only a couple months difference. These phones come with Android OS, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an older 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Moto G Stylus has a display that's just as good as the screen in Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although the Moto G Stylus has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate, a way better resolution camera and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
The Moto G Stylus features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.