Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-12 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 score. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's design is newer than Motorola Moto Z4's, but it is way heavier and thicker. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto Z4 features a display that's very similar to the Nokia 8 V 5G UW one, because although the Moto Z4 has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution, a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The Moto Z4 has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has better battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs more money than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z4. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Moto Z4, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.