Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW body is a lot older, a bit heavier and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the previous 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a just a bit better screen density, a bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a 27 percent greater battery size. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a lot higher video quality.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Nokia 8 V 5G UW is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.