Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2017-08-28 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is much better than the Nokia 8's 73.8 global score. The Google Pixel 2 is a somewhat lighter phone than Nokia 8, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Nokia 8 counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a little bigger display and a better pixels quantity per display inch.
The Nokia 8 counts with a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. Nokia 8 counts with a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 2. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
Nokia 8 features a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3090mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit better camera than Nokia 8, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.