Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Nokia 8, getting a overall score of 77.8 against 73.8. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is noticeably heavier than Nokia 8, it's a lot thinner and also extremely newer. The Nokia 8 counts with a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Nokia 8, because although it has a lot worse number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with much more display brightness, a lot bigger screen and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Nokia 8, because it has a lot larger camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery duration than Nokia 8, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Nokia 8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Nokia 8. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Nokia 8, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.