Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian Belle | -- |
| 2012-02-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.88 x 2.37 x 0.55 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 184 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 41.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.83 inches (1/1.2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 465 hours standby time 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is a lot better than Nokia 808 PureView's 56.7 global score. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL is somewhat heavier than Nokia 808 PureView, it's a lot thinner and also extremely newer. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much more powerful CPU than Nokia 808 PureView, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a lot better looking display than Nokia 808 PureView, because it has a lot higher display pixels density, a way bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia 808 PureView, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia 808 PureView, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity. The Nokia 808 PureView features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Nokia 808 PureView also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Google Pixel 4 XL is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.