Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Symbian Belle | Android 12 |
| 2012-02-27 | 2022-08-18 |
| 4.88 x 2.37 x 0.55 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Mineral Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 184 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 41.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.83 inches (1/1.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 465 hours standby time 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is way better than the Nokia 808 PureView, with an 84.7 score against 56.7. The Motorola Edge (2022) body is notably newer and much thinner than Nokia 808 PureView's, but it's a little bit heavier. The Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12 OS, while Nokia 808 PureView works with Symbian Belle OS.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a sharper display than Nokia 808 PureView, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a way bigger screen and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Edge (2022) features a much better performing CPU than Nokia 808 PureView, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a slightly better camera than Nokia 808 PureView, because it has a way higher (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with more mega-pixels and a way larger aperture for better low light photography and video. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Nokia 808 PureView, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a much better battery life than Nokia 808 PureView, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola Edge (2022) is also the cheapest, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.