Search


Compare phones

Global Score
22.860.4
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--Android 4.2
--2014-03-15
4.10 x 1.80 x 0.80 inches5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches
3.40 ounces4.90 ounces
--Black and White
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--4.5 inches
--540 x 960 pixels
--TFT
--245 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
2.77.8
processor Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.768.1
Storage
--8 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
04.62
Camera
--5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
05.94
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--Micro SIM
04.6
Battery Life
920mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
192 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
--
2.484
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.0, EDR
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy S3 Slim has a global score of 60.4, which is way better than Nokia 8260's general score of 22.8. The Galaxy S3 Slim body is notably thinner but notably heavier than the Nokia 8260. The Galaxy S3 Slim features a very superior processing unit than Nokia 8260, because it has 4 more processing cores.

Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim features a lot better looking display than Nokia 8260. The Galaxy S3 Slim features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8260, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 32 GB. Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has a really longer battery performance than Nokia 8260, because it has a 128 percent greater battery capacity.

Galaxy S3 Slim takes much better videos and photos than Nokia 8260.

The Galaxy S3 Slim and the Nokia 8260 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.