Search


Compare phones

Global Score
22.858.9
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--Android 4.1.2
--2013-01-25
4.10 x 1.80 x 0.80 inches5.14 x 2.67 x 0.47 inches
3.40 ounces5.24 ounces
--Black, Gray and Red
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--4 inches
--480 x 800 pixels
--TFT
--233 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
2.77.6
processorARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.767.83
Storage
--4 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
03.82
Camera
--5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution
05.94
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
04.2
Battery Life
920mAh Li-Ion Battery1700mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
192 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
570 hours standby time
15.1 hours talk time
2.483.52
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Galaxy Xcover 2 has a general score of 58.9, which is much better than Nokia 8260's 22.8 overall score. The Galaxy Xcover 2 is a way thinner but extremely heavier phone than the Nokia 8260. The Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2 has a way better looking display than Nokia 8260. Galaxy Xcover 2 has a superior storage for games and applications than Nokia 8260, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 32 GB.

Galaxy Xcover 2 counts with a much better performing processor than Nokia 8260, because it has an extra graphics co-processor and a higher number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2 captures way better photographs and videos than Nokia 8260. The Galaxy Xcover 2 features a much better battery performance than Nokia 8260, because it has 1700mAh of battery capacity against 920mAh.

The Galaxy Xcover 2 costs exactly the same than the Nokia 8260, which makes this phone a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.