Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 481 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 14.74 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9.3 PureView has a score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 9.3 PureView has 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. The Nokia 9.3 PureView construction is noticeably thinner and notably lighter than the HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better screen than Nokia 9.3 PureView, although it has a much smaller screen, a just a bit less pixels per screen inch and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Nokia 9.3 PureView has a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
HTC One M9 has a bit superior processing unit than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. Nokia 9.3 PureView counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% larger battery size.
Nokia 9.3 PureView shoots greater photographs and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images, a much better video definition and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.