Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2019-03-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 overall score. Google Pixel 2 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Nokia 9 PureView, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a larger display, a quite higher pixel amount per inch in the display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Google Pixel 2's storage capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Nokia 9 PureView's one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nokia 9 PureView features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3320mAh battery size against 2700mAh. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 2 also has a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with more MP.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.