Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2019-03-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 76.4. Although Google Pixel XL is much older and a little bit thicker than Nokia 9 PureView, it's body is still just a bit lighter. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel XL, because it has a little bigger display, a just a bit higher screen pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. Google Pixel XL takes just a bit better photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a higher resolution.
Google Pixel XL has as much storage capacity for games and applications as Nokia 9 PureView, both have exactly the same internal storage. Google Pixel XL features a little longer battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel XL is more expensive than the Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.