Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| 2019-03-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. The LG V20 body is a little thinner than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's just a little heavier and was released 3 years before. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better processing unit than LG V20, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit sharper display than LG V20, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit better display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG V20 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the LG V20 also has a camera with much more MP.
The LG V20 counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView features just a little better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 4% bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG V20 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.