Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 76.4 score against 76.4. Nokia 9 PureView is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also just a little lighter and thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Nokia 9 PureView has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and more RAM.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots a bit better photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video and worse 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Droid Turbo features greater battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.