Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, having a global score of 77.9 against 76.4. Motorola DROID Turbo is a way older, extremely thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than the Nokia 9 PureView. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a better looking screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount per screen inch.
Nokia 9 PureView has just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Nokia 9 PureView features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with superior battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3320mAh. Motorola DROID Turbo shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has lower 24 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.