Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has an overall score of 79.7, which is slightly better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 overall score. Motorola Moto G Stylus's design is newer, but thicker and heavier than the Nokia 9 PureView. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto G Stylus shoots much better photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera, a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video and a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features greater battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.