Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2019-03-03 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is much better than Nokia 9 PureView's overall score of 76.4. Although Galaxy A80 is better than the Nokia 9 PureView, it must be noted that it's also a heavier and thicker phone. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Nokia 9 PureView and Galaxy A80 both feature quite similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, they have the same 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy A80 counts with a much better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.