Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-03-03 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Nokia 9 PureView, with a general score of 90.5 against 76.4. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy A90 5G is a somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone than Nokia 9 PureView. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G's CPU is very similar to the processor in Nokia 9 PureView, both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A90 5G features greater battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 36% larger battery size. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a greater camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.