Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-03 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, getting a overall score of 81 against 76.4. Galaxy C9 Pro is a way older and a bit heavier phone than the Nokia 9 PureView, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat thinner anyway. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Nokia 9 PureView features a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a way higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a higher display pixel density. Nokia 9 PureView takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a little bit better memory for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with greater battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.