Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Nokia 9 PureView, with a 77.8 score against 76.4. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is extremely heavier than Nokia 9 PureView, it's extremely thinner and also much newer. Nokia 9 PureView counts with an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a way larger screen and a slightly higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 72% more battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger aperture and a lot higher video quality.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Nokia 9 PureView, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia 9 PureView. So if you need that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Nokia 9 PureView, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.