Compare phones
Nokia Asha 500
Dual SIM| Global Score | |
| 37.5 | 40.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HP |
| -- | webOS 2.1 |
| 2013-10-22 | 2011-02-09 |
| 4.04 x 2.38 x 0.45 inches | 3.31 x 2.15 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.57 ounces | 3.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Red, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| $ 95.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 2.6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 320 x 400 pixels |
| LCD | LCD |
| 143 pixels per inch | 197 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM7230 chipset |
| processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 7.2 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 3.3 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | -- |
| 320 x 240 (13 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | -- |
| 5.72 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 2.8 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 910mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 528 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.88 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HP Veer 4G is slightly better than the Nokia Asha 500, with a 40.5 score against 37.5. HP Veer 4G is a older, just a bit heavier and extremely thicker phone than the Nokia Asha 500. HP Veer 4G has a very superior CPU than Nokia Asha 500, because it has an extra GPU and 1 more cpu cores. HP Veer 4G has a much better looking display than Nokia Asha 500, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 400 x 320 resolution.
Nokia Asha 500 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than HP Veer 4G, although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution. The HP Veer 4G has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia Asha 500, although it has no slot for an external memory card.
The Nokia Asha 500 features a very superior battery performance than HP Veer 4G, because it has a 32% bigger battery size.
HP Veer 4G not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.