Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 38 | 40.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HP |
| -- | webOS 2.1 |
| 2013-10-22 | 2011-02-09 |
| 4.04 x 2.38 x 0.45 inches | 3.31 x 2.15 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.57 ounces | 3.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Red, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 95.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 2.6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 320 x 400 pixels |
| LCD | LCD |
| 143 pixels per inch | 197 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM7230 chipset |
| processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 5.94 | 7.2 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 3.3 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | -- |
| 320 x 240 (13 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | -- |
| 5.72 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 2.8 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 910mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 528 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.88 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HP Veer 4G has a global score of 40.5, which is just a bit better than the Nokia Asha 500's score of 38. HP Veer 4G is a better device than Nokia Asha 500, we must highlight that it is also extremely older, much thicker and just a little heavier. HP Veer 4G has a better display than Nokia Asha 500, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 400 x 320 pixels.
HP Veer 4G counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Nokia Asha 500, although it has no SD memory card expansion slot. The HP Veer 4G has an extremely better processing unit than Nokia Asha 500, because although it has a worse GPU running at 245 megahertz, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
Nokia Asha 500 features a much better battery life than HP Veer 4G, because it has a 32% bigger battery size. Nokia Asha 500 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than HP Veer 4G, although it has a camera with a much lower resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, HP Veer 4G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.