Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 38 | 60.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2013-10-22 | 2013-11-13 |
| 4.04 x 2.38 x 0.45 inches | 5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches |
| 3.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 143 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 5.94 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 3.3 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | -- |
| 320 x 240 (13 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.72 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 2.8 | 4.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2070mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 528 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time |
| 2.88 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G is way better than Nokia Asha 500, having a general score of 60.3 against 38. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also a a bit thicker and noticeably heavier phone. The Moto G features a much more vibrant display than Nokia Asha 500, because it has a way better pixels quantity per inch of display, a lot bigger display and a much higher 1280 x 720 resolution.
Motorola Moto G has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Nokia Asha 500, although it has no external memory slot. The Moto G features a much better performance than Nokia Asha 500, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster), a greater amount of RAM memory and a faster graphics processing unit running at 450 megahertz.
The Moto G counts with a much better camera than Nokia Asha 500, because it has a much higher 5 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher 1280x720 (HD) video quality. Moto G features a superior battery life than Nokia Asha 500, because it has a 73% bigger battery capacity.
Moto G costs a bit more than Nokia Asha 500, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.