Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 38.8 | 60.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2013-10-22 | 2013-11-13 |
| 3.92 x 2.34 x 0.44 inches | 5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 133 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 3.3 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | -- |
| 32.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.6 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 2.8 | 4.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1010mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2070mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 576 hours standby time 13.7 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time |
| 2.56 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G has a global score of 60.3, which is a lot better than Nokia Asha 502's global score of 38.8. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, it must be told that it's also extremely heavier and just a bit thicker. Moto G has a lot better display than Nokia Asha 502, because it has a way bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1280 x 720px and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto G has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia Asha 502, although it has no external SD slot. The Moto G features a much more powerful CPU than Nokia Asha 502, because it has an extra graphics processing unit, a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Moto G captures clearer pictures and videos than Nokia Asha 502, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Moto G also has a way higher 1280x720 (HD) video quality. The Motorola Moto G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia Asha 502, because it has 2070mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G costs a bit more than the Nokia Asha 502, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.