Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 36.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2010-11-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.32 x 1.85 x 0.60 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 5.94 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 47,1 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.4 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.39 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 430 hours standby time 8.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than Nokia C2-01, having a overall score of 83.8 against 36.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 is much heavier than the Nokia C2-01, it's way thinner and also extremely newer. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better screen than Nokia C2-01, because it has a lot larger display, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much greater processing power than Nokia C2-01, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and more RAM. Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia C2-01, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 has a way better battery life than Nokia C2-01, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A50 counts with a way better camera than Nokia C2-01, because it has a lot higher (Full HD) video resolution and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a bit cheaper, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.