Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2010-09-15 | 2020-06-19 |
| 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 167 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 143 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 408 hours standby time 5.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type, with a 91.8 score against 43.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is extremely heavier than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type, it's extremely thinner and newer. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better looking display than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a way larger screen, a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a much better pixel quantity per display inch.
Galaxy A71 5G has a really superior processing power than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has more cores and 5,88 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better camera than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with much more memory for games and applications than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.