Compare phones
Nokia C3 Touch and Type
C3-01.5Samsung Galaxy Pocket
S5300| Global Score | |
| 43.7 | 47.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 2.3.6 |
| 2010-09-15 | 2012-03-06 |
| 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches | 4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 3.42 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 143 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.2 | 6.4 |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Single-Core 832 MHz processor |
| 128 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 7.29 | 7.02 |
| Storage | |
| 143 MB internal memory | 3 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.02 | 3.52 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) slow motion video | -- |
| 5.94 | 5.06 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.5 | 3.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 408 hours standby time 5.6 hours talk time | 520 hours standby time 15.8 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer and Compass |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Pocket has a global score of 47.8, which is just a bit better than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type's 43.7 general score. Galaxy Pocket's construction is newer and a little bit lighter than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type's, but it is just a bit thicker. The Nokia C3 Touch and Type features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Pocket. Both of them have a Single-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket features a slightly better screen than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact 320 x 240 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket also counts with a bigger screen. The Nokia C3 Touch and Type counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Pocket, because it has a way higher 640x480 (VGA) video resolution and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 32 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket also has 2,86 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Pocket counts with just a little better battery duration than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.