Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2010-09-15 | 2020-11-06 |
| 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 167 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Single-Core 800 MHz processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 7.2 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) slow motion video | -- |
| 5.94 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 408 hours standby time 5.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is much better than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type's general score of 42.7. The LG K92 construction is notably newer and thinner than Nokia C3 Touch and Type's, although it is a lot heavier. The LG K92 features a much better processing power than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG K92 features a much sharper screen than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a lot bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much greater screen density. The LG K92 features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 takes way better photographs and videos than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. LG K92 has a much longer battery performance than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a 281 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG K92 is also cheap compared to the Nokia C3 Touch and Type.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.