Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2010-09-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 167 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Single-Core 800 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 7.2 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 408 hours standby time 5.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is a lot better than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type, getting an 87.5 score against 42.7. Although the Galaxy A71 is notably heavier than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type, it's extremely thinner and also notably newer. The Galaxy A71 has a lot better screen than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a way higher number of pixels per inch in the display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a way bigger display.
Galaxy A71 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores. Galaxy A71 shoots much better photos and videos than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has 127,97 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 1050mAh.
Galaxy A71 costs a bit more than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.