Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2010-09-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Single-Core 800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.2 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 408 hours standby time 5.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is way better than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type's general score of 42.7. Galaxy S10e's design is newer and much thinner than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type's, although it is a lot heavier. The Galaxy S10e counts with a much more vibrant screen than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a much better screen density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a much larger screen.
The Galaxy S10e has a much powerful CPU than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Galaxy S10e captures much clearer photos and videos than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a way better video resolution and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy S10e has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S10e features a much better battery duration than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10e costs a little more than the Nokia C3 Touch and Type, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.