Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.7 | 46.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Sony |
| -- | Symbian Symbian^1 |
| 2010-09-15 | 2009-02-15 |
| 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches | 4.41 x 2.17 x 0.52 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 4.44 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 119.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 3.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 360 x 640 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 210 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Resistive |
| 6.1 | 6.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | TI OMAP3430 chipset |
| Single-Core 800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 256 MB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU |
| 7.2 | 6.93 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 131,07 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.72 | 0.6 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.10 MP |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | -- |
| 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) slow motion video | -- |
| 5.94 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 408 hours standby time 5.6 hours talk time | 360 hours standby time 11 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Ericsson Satio is a bit better than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, with a 46.7 score against 42.7. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Sony Ericsson Satio construction is older, way heavier and thicker than Nokia C3 Touch and Type. Nokia C3 Touch and Type features a little bit better processing power than Sony Ericsson Satio, because although it has 192 MB less RAM, and they both have 1 cores, the Nokia C3 Touch and Type also counts with a faster 320 megahertz graphics co-processor.
The Sony Ericsson Satio features a more vivid display than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher 640 x 360px resolution and a much larger display. Nokia C3 Touch and Type counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Ericsson Satio, although it has only 30,72 MB internal memory capacity.
Nokia C3 Touch and Type counts with a little longer battery duration than Sony Ericsson Satio, because it has 1050mAh of battery capacity. Sony Ericsson Satio counts with a slightly better camera than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 12.1 mega pixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Sony Ericsson Satio is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.