Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian Belle, Symbian^3 | -- |
| 2010-09-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.09 x 2.07 x 0.55 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 229 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 680 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 348,16 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.22 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (25 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 420 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a lot better than Nokia C6-01, having an 83.8 score against 46.7. Even though Galaxy A50 is way heavier than Nokia C6-01, it's extremely thinner and way newer. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a brighter screen than Nokia C6-01, because it has a way bigger screen, a way better display density and a much better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much more powerful processing unit than Nokia C6-01, because it has a greater number of cores and 3,75 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A50 takes a lot better photos and videos than Nokia C6-01, because it has a much bigger aperture, a lot better video definition and a much more megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia C6-01, because it has 127,66 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better battery life than Nokia C6-01, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 1050mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than the Nokia C6-01, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.