Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.4 | -- |
| 2010-04-13 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.46 x 2.09 x 0.66 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 229 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.48 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 245,76 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 400 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is way better than the Nokia C6's 43.7 overall score. Google Pixel 3 XL is a newer and thinner cellphone than Nokia C6, but it is also heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a much powerful processing unit than Nokia C6, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a much sharper display than Nokia C6, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution, a lot larger display and a lot better pixel quantity per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a lot better camera than Nokia C6, because it has a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Nokia C6, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia C6, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity instead of 1200mAh.
Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.