Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian Symbian^3 | -- |
| 2010-09-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.62 x 2.24 x 0.41 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Brown and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 210 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 680 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (25 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 555 hours standby time 9.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is way better than Nokia C7's score of 49.8. Google Pixel 2 is a extremely newer and thinner phone than Nokia C7, but it is a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 2 features a lot better hardware performance than Nokia C7, because it has more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 2 has a better display than Nokia C7, because it has a much bigger display, a way better pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 1920. The Google Pixel 2 has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia C7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Nokia C7, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger aperture and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. Google Pixel 2 has a very superior battery duration than Nokia C7, because it has a 125 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 costs the same than the Nokia C7, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.