Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 39.9 | 42.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| Symbian 9.2 | -- |
| 2007-09-18 | 2010-09-15 |
| 4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches | 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches |
| 3.52 ounces | 3.53 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Yellow |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor | Single-Core 800 MHz processor |
| 96 MB RAM | 64 MB RAM |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 7.2 |
| Storage | |
| 133,12 MB internal memory | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.6 | 1.72 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| -- | 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.3 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1070mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 312 hours standby time 4.4 hours talk time | 408 hours standby time 5.6 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Nokia C3 Touch and Type has a global score of 42.7, which is just a bit better than the Nokia E51's 39.9 general score. Nokia C3 Touch and Type's construction is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Nokia E51. The Nokia E51 counts with a little more vivid screen than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, and although they both have an equal resolution of 320 x 240, the Nokia E51 also has a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Nokia C3 Touch and Type counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia E51, although it has less internal memory capacity. The Nokia C3 Touch and Type counts with a superior processing power than Nokia E51, because although it has 32 MB less RAM memory, and they both have 1 processing cores, the Nokia C3 Touch and Type also counts with an extra GPU.
Nokia E51 features a bit better battery life than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size. Nokia C3 Touch and Type counts with a superior camera than Nokia E51, because it has a way higher 640x480 video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better 5 mega-pixels resolution.
The Nokia C3 Touch and Type is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.