Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Cricket |
| Symbian 9.1 | -- |
| 2006-09-12 | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 5.10 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.4 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 81,92 MB internal memory | -- |
| miniSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.5 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 336 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Cricket CAPTR has an overall score of 27.9, which is slightly better than the Nokia E62's score of 26.2. Even though Cricket CAPTR is incredibly thicker than Nokia E62, it's way lighter and also newer. Cricket CAPTR counts with a CPU that's just as good as the Nokia E62 one, both have 0 CPU cores.
Cricket CAPTR has a way better screen than Nokia E62, although it has a way worse resolution of 160 x 128px. Nokia E62 features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Cricket CAPTR. Nokia E62 has a much longer battery lifetime than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a 1500mAh battery size instead of 920mAh.
The Cricket CAPTR captures greater photos and videos than Nokia E62.
The Cricket CAPTR is a bit more expensive than the Nokia E62, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.