Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace
GT-S5830, GT-S5830I| Global Score | |
| 44.4 | 48.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 2.3, 2.2 |
| 2009-06-15 | 2011-01-26 |
| 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches | 4.43 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 3.99 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 3.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 320 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 165 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU |
| 6.75 | 7.11 |
| Storage | |
| 256 MB internal memory | 161,79 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.8 | 2.02 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 7.15 | 5.83 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time | 640 hours standby time 11 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 3.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Ace is a little bit better than Nokia E72, getting a general score of 48.3 against 44.4. The Galaxy Ace counts with Android 2.3 OS, and Nokia E72 comes with Symbian 9.3 OS. Although the Galaxy Ace is somewhat thicker than the Nokia E72, it's somewhat lighter and newer. The Samsung Galaxy Ace has just a bit better display than Nokia E72, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 480 x 320px and a way bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Ace counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Nokia E72, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 32 GB. The Galaxy Ace has just a bit better performance than Nokia E72, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Ace also has an extra graphics co-processor.
Nokia E72 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Ace, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the Nokia E72 also has a way better (VGA) video resolution. The Nokia E72 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Ace, because it has a 1500mAh battery capacity against 1350mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Ace is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.