Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Nokia G400's global score of 75.5. Google Pixel 2's design is much lighter and thinner than the Nokia G400, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little faster processor than Nokia G400. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better display than Nokia G400, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density. Nokia G400 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Nokia G400 also has a lot more megapixels back camera and higher video frame rates.
The Google Pixel 2 features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Nokia G400, because it has more internal memory capacity. Nokia G400 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.