Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-24 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.55 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Meteor Grey | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G SM4350-AC (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than Nokia G400, with a general score of 84.9 against 75.5. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also an extremely older, heavier and a little thicker phone. The Nokia G400 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 and a just a little higher pixel density.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia G400, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Nokia G400, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A80 also has more RAM memory.
Nokia G400 counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 35 percent greater battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a little bit better camera than Nokia G400, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.