Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 253 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than Nokia G50, with an 81.6 score against 74.5. The Google Pixel 2 body is extremely lighter and thinner than the Nokia G50. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little better performance than Nokia G50. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Google Pixel 2 has a better looking screen than Nokia G50, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
Nokia G50 counts with a greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Nokia G50 has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Nokia G50 takes clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Nokia G50 also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.