Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| -- | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.84 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Ocean Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 253 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Nokia G50, with a 90.5 score against 74.5. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, and Nokia G50 comes with Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a just a little thinner and a bit lighter phone than Nokia G50. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Nokia G50, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a sharper display than Nokia G50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and way more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a better camera than Nokia G50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia G50, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 64 GB more internal memory. The Nokia G50 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.