Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-07-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.13 x 2.81 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, White and Yellow | Mystic indigo |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 315.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 332 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 41.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 384 hours standby time 19.1 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is better than the Lumia 1020's general score of 68.7. The Moto G Stylus has Android 11 OS, while Lumia 1020 works with Windows Phone 8.1, 8 OS. Although the Moto G Stylus is somewhat heavier than Lumia 1020, it's somewhat thinner and also newer.
Lumia 1020 features a much better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, although it has a much lower resolution of 1280 x 768 pixels, a bit lower count of pixels per screen inch and a really smaller display. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Lumia 1020, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus has a bit faster CPU than Nokia Lumia 1020, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster). The Moto G Stylus takes a little bit better videos and photos than Lumia 1020, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor which offers a way lower photo and video quality, it also counts with a camera with a higher 48 megapixels resolution, a lot larger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Moto G Stylus has a superior battery performance than Lumia 1020, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Moto G Stylus is also the cheapest, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.