Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.5 | 58.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 4.4.2, 4.0.4 |
| 2012-12-05 | 2012-09-05 |
| 4.54 x 2.41 x 0.43 inches | 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.48 ounces | 4.44 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Orange, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.8 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Advanced |
| 246 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.56 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.59 | 6.27 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 14.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola RAZR M is a little bit better than Nokia Lumia 620, having a 58.9 score against 53.5. Even though Motorola RAZR M and the Nokia Lumia 620 were only released 3 months apart, Motorola RAZR M is noticeably thinner and a little bit lighter. Motorola RAZR M works with Android 4.4.2 operating system, while Nokia Lumia 620 works with Windows Phone 8 operating system.
Motorola RAZR M has a better CPU than Lumia 620, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola RAZR M also has an extra GPU and a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola RAZR M has a little more vivid screen than Lumia 620, because it has a little bit higher 960 x 540 pixels resolution, a little bit better display density and a little bigger screen.
The Nokia Lumia 620 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 64 GB. Nokia Lumia 620 features a much better camera than Motorola RAZR M, although it has a lot lower video definition and a back camera with a lot lower resolution.
The Motorola RAZR M has a much longer battery performance than Lumia 620, because it has 2000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola RAZR M is also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.