Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-02-25 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.04 x 2.66 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 6.70 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.29 inches (1/3.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 504 hours standby time 23.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the Lumia 720, getting an 83.7 score against 55.9. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than Lumia 720's, although it is also way heavier. LG V50 ThinQ counts with Android 10 operating system, and Lumia 720 counts with Windows Phone 8 operating system.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much powerful CPU than Nokia Lumia 720, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Lumia 720, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of screen, a really bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better camera than Lumia 720, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality photos and a lot larger camera aperture. The LG V50 ThinQ has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Lumia 720, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 120 GB more internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better battery lifetime than Lumia 720, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the Lumia 720.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.