Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2012-10-09 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.03 x 2.69 x 0.43 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 400 hours standby time 10.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a lot better than the Lumia 810's global score of 58.2. Google Pixel 2 is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also a bit lighter and way thinner than the Lumia 810. Google Pixel 2 features a little sharper display than Lumia 810, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, a larger screen and a way higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 2 has a faster CPU than Lumia 810, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. Google Pixel 2 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Lumia 810, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 120 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much better camera than Lumia 810, because it has a much more megapixels back camera, a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Google Pixel 2 counts with a really longer battery performance than Lumia 810, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 is a bit more expensive than Nokia Lumia 810, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.