Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2012-10-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.03 x 2.69 x 0.44 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.99 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 254 hours standby time 10.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is much better than the Nokia Lumia 822, having a overall score of 80.2 against 61.1. The Google Pixel design is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner than the Nokia Lumia 822's, but it is also a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel has a little more vivid display than Lumia 822, because it has a lot higher pixel amount per inch in the screen, a bigger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
Google Pixel has just a little better performance than Nokia Lumia 822, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and 3 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel has a superior storage to install applications and games than Nokia Lumia 822, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel features a very superior battery duration than Nokia Lumia 822, because it has a 54% more battery capacity. Google Pixel captures much better pictures and videos than Nokia Lumia 822, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a camera with lot more megapixels and a much better video definition.
Google Pixel not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Lumia 822, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.