Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 68.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2013-05-14 | 2013-08-01 |
| 5.08 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 145.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 332 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 8.70 MP + 1.20 MP | 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 432 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto X has an overall score of 68.1, which is just a bit better than Lumia 925's global score of 62. The Moto X construction is a bit lighter but somewhat thicker than the Lumia 925, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Moto X works with Android 4.4.4 OS, and Lumia 925 counts with Windows Phone 8 OS.
The Nokia Lumia 925 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto X, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1280 x 768 resolution and a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto X counts with a bit better performance than Lumia 925, and although they both have a Dual-Core CPU and a 400 megahertz graphics processor, the Motorola Moto X also has more RAM.
Moto X and Nokia Lumia 925 both count with very similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have the same 16 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto X counts with a bit better camera than Lumia 925, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto X also counts with a larger sensor, a camera in the back with a better resolution and faster video frame rates.
Moto X features a little better battery lifetime than Lumia 925, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
The Moto X not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.