Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 10 |
| 2014-04-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 208.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 552 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is much better than the Lumia 930's general score of 69.2. The LG V40 ThinQ is a extremely newer and extremely thinner cellphone than Lumia 930, although it is just a little bit heavier. The LG V40 ThinQ comes with Android 10 OS, and Lumia 930 counts with Windows Phone 8.1 OS.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Lumia 930, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 GB more RAM and more processing cores. Lumia 930 features a bit better display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch of display and a much smaller display.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Nokia Lumia 930, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, a back facing camera with a much worse 12 MP resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
LG V40 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Lumia 930, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better battery duration than Lumia 930, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2420mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V40 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.